Category: Competition, Reflection, Cooperation Activity
Topic: Sustainability, International relations
Aim: To understand sustainability as the product of a complex system that starts with personal and collective attitudes and which includes economic relations, international relations, (and specifically north/south) environment, history, etc.
Duration: Around 45-60 minutes
Material needed: Chairs (one for each participant), sticks (around 10 per participant); markers, flipchart
Description:
The activity is played in 3 phases, and each phase has several rounds (for example 3 or 4). There is a flip chart prepared, with a table, where the facilitator will write the results of each round and each phase. Participants sit on chairs, in a circle, but looking outside the circle (not within). They are told these instructions:
Game explanation
● Each of you is a country, tell me the country you are in. NOTE: when the participants tell the country each represents, the facilitator writes it on the tables of the flipchart.
● Your responsibility is to survive. You need 4 sticks to survive. If you don't get the 4 sticks, your country will die and you won't be able to participate until the next phase.
● You will close your eyes and we will throw these sticks to the floor, and when I say “now!” you should open your eyes and you have to go as fast as possible to take the sticks you need to survive.
● When I say “stop!” you won't be allowed to take any more sticks and you have to return back to your seat.
NOTE FOR TRAINERS: they can take more than 4 sticks if they want. We don't encourage nor discourage them to do so…we don't want to give more instructions than the given ones. Despite this, the facilitator will adopt the tone of a contest, to stimulate their attitude.
Step 1. First phase – PRE-INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY Once instructions are told and sticks (around 10 per participant) are thrown on the floor (sticks are thrown unequally around the participants), participants get them, and we say “stop!”, it will be time to count the results. One facilitator will write the results; those participants who have less than 4 sticks are eliminated and the facilitator tells it with big grief. Those who took 4 are correct. And those with more than 4 are received with surprise and admiration (“wow! They took that many!! -we never say that it is good or bad-). There are 3 rounds played until there are no more sticks on the floor. Once we count the results, we take all the sticks, and they are removed (they only know it after it happens in the first round). The new round is with only the sticks still on the floor. At the end of the established number of rounds for the phase, we count how many countries survived, how many died. After that, we start the next phase, again with all the participants.
Step 2. Second phase- INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY After the 1st round, we explain to them that those who took more than 4, now they have an advantage: we will say a first “now!”, when only them will go for the resources; and a second “now!” when the ones who only survived with 4 will be able to go as well for the resources. At the end of the established number of rounds for the phase, we count how many countries survived, how many died. After that, we start the next phase, again with all participants.
Step 3. Third phase – CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY The same as the Second Phase, but after each round, we will throw again to the floor half of the sticks the participants took. At the end of the established number of rounds for the phase, we count how many countries survived, how many died.
ANALYSIS
● What were the results of each phase? (how many countries survived until the end? How many survived at least 2 phases? Any phase with all surviving?) -participants shall note that the “death” of one country is already a failure…and most of them die…
● Do you think each phase has a correspondence with historic phases? (which ones? It is supposed to be pre-industrial societies -they just used the resources; industrialised societies -those with benefits can invest to create technology and have an advantage; postindustrial societies
● What is it that motivated the death of the countries? More than the scarcity of resources, it will be the use of them, the attitude towards them (excessive consumption, competition against others, …) and the other countries that motivated the death.
● Did anybody try to change behaviour? What happened then?
● Were there at any moment dynamics of Cooperation?
● Which alternatives could have arisen? (collaboration-solidarity; sustainable consumption; de-growth; education for sustainability -telling the others that this way is gonna kill them all…)
● When do we change our behaviour? (After experiencing things that are going wrong, we ACTIVATE OUR CRITICAL THINKING).
● Is it enough to recycle to survive?? What else can be done??
Download this support table in PDFTags: Long, Difficult preparation, Critical thinking, Indoor